Philosophy · Thought Map

Philosophy Map

A study guide to philosophy organized by period: each chapter comes with an intro, questions to answer, and its philosophers, main ideas, major works, and social impact.

01

Ancient Greek Philosophy

~600 BCE – 200 CE

The Greeks were the first to ask systematically what the world is made of, how knowledge is possible, and how one ought to live, replacing mythic narrative with arguments open to refutation. From the Milesian question of first principles, through the Socratic-Platonic-Aristotelian foundations of soul, polis, and metaphysics, to the Hellenistic concern with personal flourishing in Stoicism, Epicureanism, and Skepticism, this era forged nearly the entire working vocabulary of Western philosophy and science.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. How do Thales, Anaximander, and Heraclitus each answer the question of the first principle, and where do their strategies diverge?
  2. How does the Socratic elenchus actually work, and is its aim to establish knowledge or expose ignorance?
  3. What are the core ontological differences between Plato's theory of Forms and Aristotle's theory of substance?
  4. Why were Aristotle's formal and final causes re-examined (and largely rejected) with the rise of early modern science?
  5. How do Stoic oikeiosis and Epicurean ataraxia each prescribe a route to the good life, and where do they clash?
  6. How does Pyrrhonian suspension of judgment (epoche) lead to tranquility, and how does it differ from Academic skepticism?
  7. How does Plotinus' hierarchy of the One, Intellect, and Soul transform Platonism and prepare resources for Christian theology?
  8. Why does Plato want to banish the poets in the Republic, and what epistemological claims about mimesis ground that argument?

Philosophers

Main ideas

  • Plato's claim that genuine reality consists of abstract, unchanging Forms that sensible particulars only imperfectly instantiate.

  • Aristotle's material, formal, efficient, and final causes — a complete explanation of why something is the way it is.

  • Ethics centered on character and practical wisdom rather than rules or outcomes; systematized by Aristotle and revived today.

  • Method of cross-examining an interlocutor's beliefs to expose contradictions, with acknowledged ignorance as the starting point for inquiry.

  • The cosmos is governed by divine reason; human freedom consists in aligning one's judgments with nature and virtue.

  • Reality is atoms and void; the good life is a rational, moderate pleasure defined negatively as absence of pain.

  • For every claim an equally strong counter-claim can be made, so one suspends judgment (epoche) and attains tranquility.

  • Plotinus holds that all reality flows from an ineffable One, giving later Christian theology a philosophical model of creation.

Major works

  • Uses the question of justice to weave together psychology, education, and political theory; foundational for Western political philosophy.

  • A series of speeches on eros that climb from bodily attraction to the vision of Beauty itself.

  • Systematic account of eudaimonia, virtue, friendship, and practical wisdom; the source text of virtue ethics.

  • Investigates 'being qua being' and introduces substance, potency and act, and the unmoved mover.

  • Defines the human as a political animal and analyzes regimes and citizen virtue; a touchstone of republican thought.

  • Plato's account of Socrates' defense before the Athenian court, a classic statement of philosophy's right to exist.

  • A handbook of Stoic maxims distinguishing what is 'up to us' from what is not; influential in Rome and beyond.

  • Fifty-four treatises edited by Porphyry that systematize Neoplatonic metaphysics and the ascent of the soul.

Social impact

02

Medieval Philosophy

~400 – 1400

Medieval philosophy's central task was to integrate the Greek inheritance of reason with the revealed traditions of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, addressing how faith and reason, God and creation, particular and universal hang together. Augustine, the Arabic line from al-Farabi through Avicenna and Averroes, the Jewish synthesis of Maimonides, and the Aristotelian-Christian synthesis culminating in Aquinas produced a highly technical metaphysics and ethics.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. Why is Augustine's analysis of time in the Confessions still treated as a canonical text in the philosophy of time?
  2. What is the core move of Anselm's ontological argument, and where exactly do Gaunilo and later Kant break from it?
  3. How does Avicenna's essence-existence distinction feed into Aquinas' argument that God is pure existence (ipsum esse)?
  4. Where do Averroes and al-Ghazali disagree about the relation of philosophy and revelation, and why did it matter for Latin Averroism?
  5. How did Maimonides' Guide of the Perplexed influence both Jewish scholarship and Christian and Islamic philosophy?
  6. Which metaphysical assumptions drive each of Aquinas' Five Ways, and which of them lean on Aristotelian physics?
  7. What problem about universals is Duns Scotus' haecceitas meant to solve?
  8. How do Ockham's nominalism and the principle of parsimony anticipate the direction of early modern empiricism?

Philosophers

Main ideas

  • Anselm's program: first believe, then use reason to understand what is believed, which shaped the temperament of scholastic theology.

  • From the concept of 'that than which no greater can be thought' Anselm infers God's existence — among the most disputed arguments in philosophy.

  • Avicenna argued that in creatures essence does not entail existence; only in God do essence and existence coincide, a move crucial for Aquinas.

  • Aquinas' arguments from motion, causation, contingency, degrees, and teleology to the existence of a first cause.

  • Are universals real, mental concepts, or mere names? The dispute among realism, conceptualism, and nominalism dominates late medieval thought.

  • Aquinas holds that moral law can be derived by reason from human nature — a rational creature's participation in the eternal law.

  • Duns Scotus argues that the word 'being' means the same thing when said of God and creatures, challenging Aquinas' analogy.

  • Do not multiply entities beyond necessity; universals are merely names the mind uses to group similar particulars.

Major works

Social impact

03

Renaissance & Early Modern

~1400 – 1700

In this period philosophy broke from scholastic frameworks and sought new foundations for nature, the self, and the state. Cartesian methodical doubt, Baconian experiment, and the contract theories of Hobbes and Locke reshaped the borders of knowledge, politics, and religion. Most of our current vocabulary for scientific method, sovereignty, liberty, and toleration comes from this turn.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. Is Descartes' cogito an inference, an intuition, or a performance? Why does the distinction matter?
  2. Does Bacon's induction solve the same problem as Aristotle's syllogism, and which scholastic failure is it attacking?
  3. Is Hobbes' state of nature a historical claim, a hypothesis, or a normative device, and does the argument require a dark view of human nature?
  4. When Spinoza writes Deus sive Natura, is he a pantheist, an atheist, or a monist, and how do the three differ?
  5. Can Locke's labor-mixing argument for property justify colonial appropriation, and is his own position consistent with that argument?
  6. If Leibniz's monads have no windows, why does the world appear coordinated, and how does pre-established harmony relate to causation?
  7. Is Pascal's wager a probabilistic argument or an argument from practical reason, and is it actually persuasive to an atheist?
  8. Is Machiavelli's Prince a description of political reality, a satire of tyrants, or a manual serving a republic, and what internal evidence favors each reading?

Philosophers

Main ideas

Major works

Social impact

04

Enlightenment

~1700 – 1800

The Enlightenment took reason, critique, and freedom as its banners and reopened questions about religious authority, political institutions, and social order. Hume and Kant transformed epistemology and ethics, while Rousseau, Montesquieu, and Adam Smith reshaped thinking about sovereignty, law, and markets. The American founding, the French Revolution, modern constitutionalism, and early feminist argument are all rooted in this period.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. Is Hume's skepticism about causation aimed at metaphysical causation or at our knowledge of it, and why does that distinction matter?
  2. How does Berkeley's esse is percipi avoid solipsism, and what role does God play in the argument?
  3. What exactly does Kant's Copernican turn change — how we know objects, or the objects themselves — and is this a concession to realism or a strengthening of it?
  4. What is the difference between Rousseau's general will and the will of all, and is forcing someone to be free a paradox or a coherent political idea?
  5. Is Montesquieu's separation of powers an empirical description of England or a normative theory, and what does this imply for contemporary constitutionalism?
  6. Does Adam Smith's invisible hand rely on a theological premise, and does it sit well with the sympathy of the Theory of Moral Sentiments?
  7. Is Voltaire's case for religious toleration grounded in skepticism or in natural religion, and how does he handle atheism?
  8. Is Wollstonecraft's critique of Rousseau's view of female education an internal or external critique, and to what extent does she accept the Enlightenment's rationalist framework?

Philosophers

  • Jurist and political philosopher who compared regimes and proposed a constitutional doctrine of separated powers.

  • One of the Enlightenment's most influential public intellectuals, campaigning for toleration and civil liberty.

  • Central figure of the Scottish Enlightenment who pushed empiricism into deep skepticism about causation, induction, and the self.

  • Reworked political philosophy around the general will and offered a sweeping critique of modern civilization and education.

  • Idealist who argued that to be is to be perceived and rejected the notion of material substance.

  • Moral philosopher and political economist whose system runs from sympathy to the division of labor and markets.

  • Critical philosopher who integrated empiricism and rationalism and developed an ethics of autonomy and a project of perpetual peace.

  • Argued from reason and virtue for women's equal education and civic standing; key forerunner of modern feminism.

Main ideas

Major works

Social impact

05

19th Century Philosophy

~1800 – 1900

Nineteenth-century philosophy unfolds between Kant's legacy and the upheavals of the industrial revolution: Hegel's grand integration of history and reason on one side, and Marx, Nietzsche, and Kierkegaard's revolts against systematic philosophy on the other. It gave rise to historical materialism, proto-existentialism, utilitarianism, and pragmatism, still shaping how we argue about justice, meaning, alienation, and scientific method.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. Is Hegel's dialectic a logical method or a philosophy of history, and how does it differ from Kant's transcendental logic?
  2. What are the continuities and breaks between Marx's theory of alienation and Hegel's notion of alienation?
  3. How do Bentham and Mill diverge, and does Mill's distinction between higher and lower pleasures undermine the calculability of utility?
  4. How does Schopenhauer derive his metaphysics of the Will from Kant's thing-in-itself?
  5. Is Nietzsche's will to power a descriptive or a normative concept, and how does it relate to Darwinism?
  6. Why does Kierkegaard reject the Hegelian system, and what problem is the leap of faith meant to solve?
  7. How do Peirce, James, and Dewey differ in their accounts of truth within pragmatism?
  8. What lasting effects does Comte's three-stage law of positivism have on modern social-scientific methodology?

Philosophers

  • The great systematiser of German idealism, integrating history, logic, and ethical life through dialectic and absolute spirit.

  • Reinterprets Kant's thing-in-itself as blind Will, founding a pessimistic metaphysics that shaped later irrationalism.

  • Attacks the Hegelian system with categories of the individual, anxiety, and faith, and is read as the first existentialist.

  • Refines utilitarianism and defends individual liberty in On Liberty, grounding modern liberal political thought.

  • Develops historical materialism and a critique of capitalism built on alienation, surplus value, and class struggle.

  • Revalues values through will to power, eternal recurrence, and the death of God, targeting Christian and Platonic morality.

  • Founder of pragmatism; ties meaning to observable consequences and lays the groundwork of modern semiotics.

  • Bentham (1748–1832) formulates the greatest happiness principle; Comte (1798–1857) founds positivism and sociology.

Main ideas

  • Concepts and history advance through contradiction, sublation, and synthesis; a shared methodological core for Hegel and Marx.

  • The estrangement of persons from their labour, products, and essence, moving from Hegel's spiritual alienation to Marx's critique of capitalist work.

  • Evaluates actions and institutions by the greatest happiness of the greatest number, driving reforms in law, suffrage, and welfare.

  • Nietzsche's explanatory principle for life, knowledge, and morality, challenging inherited notions of truth and the good.

  • Kierkegaard places individual choice and faith before any universal system, supplying the core motifs of twentieth-century existentialism.

  • Peirce and James hold that an idea's meaning lies in its practical effects and that truth is verifiable and revisable.

Major works

Social impact

06

Analytic Philosophy

~1900 – present

Analytic philosophy begins with Frege and Russell's logical analysis of mathematics and language, prizing clarity, formal tools, and scientific naturalism. It has deeply shaped logic, linguistics, cognitive science, and contemporary political philosophy; today's vocabulary for debating AI, consciousness, justice, and conceptual engineering comes largely from this tradition.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. What problem does Frege's sense-reference distinction solve, and how does it differ from Mill's theory of names?
  2. How does Russell's theory of descriptions handle empty-reference sentences like The present King of France is bald?
  3. Is the shift from the early Wittgenstein's picture theory to the later meaning-as-use a clean break or a gradual evolution?
  4. How does Carnap's logical empiricism draw the analytic/synthetic distinction, and what are Quine's main objections to it?
  5. What advantages does Kripke's causal theory of reference have over descriptivism, and how does it redraw the lines between necessity and a priori knowledge?
  6. Is Rawls's original position a moral argument or a modelling device, and why does Nozick's entitlement theory count as its main challenger?
  7. Why does Parfit think personal identity is not what matters, and what does this imply for moral responsibility?
  8. How does Dennett's functionalism answer Cartesian dualism, and does heterophenomenology explain consciousness or explain it away?

Philosophers

  • Founder of modern predicate logic and philosophy of language, introducing the sense-reference distinction.

  • Develops the theory of descriptions and logical atomism and co-writes Principia Mathematica with Whitehead.

  • Shapes meta-ethics and epistemology through common-sense philosophy and the naturalistic fallacy argument.

  • Early Tractatus advances a picture theory of language; later Investigations introduces language-games and meaning as use.

  • Carnap (1891–1970) is the leading logical empiricist; Quine (1908–2000) challenges the analytic/synthetic divide and reductionism.

  • Reshapes modal logic, philosophy of language, and metaphysics with rigid designators and the causal theory of reference.

  • Rawls (1921–2002) revives normative political philosophy with A Theory of Justice; Nozick (1938–2002) defends the minimal state through entitlement theory.

  • Parfit (1942–2017) transforms views of personal identity and ethics; Dennett (1942–2024) explains consciousness through functionalism and evolution.

Main ideas

Major works

Social impact

07

Continental Philosophy

~1900 – present

Continental philosophy names a loose family of twentieth-century traditions, rooted mainly in Germany and France, that interrogate lived experience, Being, historicity, language, power and subjectivity, in contrast to the Anglo-American analytic style. From phenomenology and existentialism to structuralism, post-structuralism and the Frankfurt School, it supplies much of the vocabulary used in literary theory, social thought, feminism and political philosophy today.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. What does Husserl's phenomenological reduction bracket, and how does it differ from Cartesian doubt?
  2. Why does Heidegger attack the 'metaphysics of presence', and what do his readings of Plato and Nietzsche have in common?
  3. What argumentative work does 'existence precedes essence' do in Being and Nothingness versus Existentialism Is a Humanism?
  4. Where do Camus's 'absurd' and Sartre's 'freedom' diverge, and why did that split map onto their quarrel over Algeria?
  5. How does Discipline and Punish shift power from a repressive model to a productive network, and how is the panopticism argument built?
  6. What does Derrida actually claim with 'there is no outside-text', and how does it connect to his reading of Husserl's Origin of Geometry?
  7. How does Arendt's tripartition of labour, work and action support her diagnosis of totalitarianism and modernity?
  8. Why is Habermas's communicative rationality read as a correction of the first-generation Frankfurt School's pessimism?

Philosophers

Main ideas

Major works

Social impact

08

Eastern Philosophy

~600 BCE – present

Eastern philosophy here covers the two great classical traditions of China and India: China's pre-Qin masters (Confucian, Daoist, Legalist, Mohist) through Song-Ming neo-Confucianism to modern New Confucianism; and India's Buddha followed by Abhidharma, Madhyamaka and Yogācāra, which travelled along the Silk and maritime routes into East Asia and gave rise to Chan, Tiantai and Huayan. Both lineages press questions of order, mind, self-cultivation and liberation in ways that are not simply echoes of Greek or European thought.

After this chapter you should be able to answer

  1. Why does Confucius insist that ren must be realized through li, and how does the Analects distinguish the junzi from the xiaoren?
  2. How do Mencius's claim that human nature is good and Xunzi's claim that it is bad each account for the origin of evil and the need for education?
  3. Is Laozi's wuwei the same as doing nothing, and how does the Daodejing argue from 'non-action' to 'nothing is left undone'?
  4. How does Zhuangzi's 'equalizing things' relate to 'free and easy wandering', and what is the butterfly dream actually arguing?
  5. Why did Mohist impartial care and anti-aggression flourish briefly in the Warring States and then collapse, and where exactly does it break with Confucian graded love?
  6. How does Han Feizi fuse the Shen, Shang and Shen Dao strands into a unified theory of law, technique and position, and what is the theoretical cost of that synthesis?
  7. How do Zhu Xi's li-qi dualism and the doctrine of 'investigating things to extend knowledge' rebuild a Confucian metaphysics in the Song?
  8. Where do Wang Yangming's unity of knowledge and action and extending innate moral knowing break most sharply with Zhu Xi's programme of cultivation?
  9. How does Nāgārjuna's Mūlamadhyamakakārikā use emptiness to dismantle Sarvāstivāda svabhāva, and what did dependent-arising-as-emptiness mean for later Chan?

Philosophers

  • Founder of the Ru tradition; answered the collapse of Zhou ritual order with ren, li and the junzi ideal that shaped two millennia of East Asian ethics and politics.

  • Traditional author of the Daodejing; with dao, wuwei and a praise of the soft and yielding he opens a second main current of Chinese thought.

  • Founder of Mohism; impartial care, anti-aggression and frugality challenged aristocratic ritual order and seeded an early consequentialist strand.

  • Defended innate goodness and the four sprouts, lifting Confucian moral psychology and humane government to a systematic level.

  • Leading Daoist; used fable and irony to unsettle knowledge, language and the self, deeply shaping later Chan and Chinese art.

  • Combined a thesis of bad human nature with a strong theory of ritual and law, the most systematic Confucian of the pre-Qin era.

  • Synthesized Legalism; fused law, technique and positional power into the blueprint behind Qin imperial rule.

  • Founded Buddhism through the Four Noble Truths, Eightfold Path and dependent origination, the root of all later Mahāyāna and East Asian schools.

  • Founder of Mahāyāna Madhyamaka; used emptiness and the middle way to dismantle any metaphysics of intrinsic nature.

  • Synthesizer of Song neo-Confucianism; his li-qi metaphysics and Collected Commentaries on the Four Books defined state orthodoxy for six centuries.

  • Leader of the xin-xue school; extending innate moral knowing and the unity of knowledge and action reshaped late-imperial and modern East Asian thought.

Main ideas

Major works

  • Sayings of Confucius and his disciples; the basic textbook of East Asian education and political ethics for two thousand years.

  • Systematic defence of innate goodness, humane government and the contrast between kingly and hegemonic rule.

  • Links heaven, ritual and human nature in the most systematic theoretical project of pre-Qin Confucianism.

  • About five thousand characters of aphoristic chapters on dao, de and wuwei; a core text of Daoism and East Asian culture.

  • Inner, outer and miscellaneous chapters use parable to probe language, knowledge and death; decisive for Chinese arts and Chan temperament.

  • Contains impartial care, anti-aggression, frugality, heaven's will and ghosts, plus some of the earliest Chinese logic and engineering thought.

  • The definitive Legalist text; takes a cold, systematic realist stance on power, institutions and human nature.

  • Uses Madhyamaka dialectic to refute all claims to intrinsic nature and grounds Mahāyāna philosophy.

  • Compilation of commentary on the Analects, Mencius, Great Learning and Doctrine of the Mean; the canonical text of the imperial examinations for over six centuries.

  • Records dialogues with disciples that set out extending innate moral knowing and the unity of knowledge and action, the central text of xin-xue.

Social impact